where the SmartPower generation connects

Democrats

Wed, 05/22/2013 - 10:42am

So, what is this really about, after all?  Posturing?  Power?  Manipulation?  Each of these and more plays a role, but at the foundation the discussion around the digital water cooler on this hearing is really about transparency - a value that is becoming more and more deeply ingrained in our society in this era.  People make assumptions about something/someone being "good" or "bad" based on how transparent their behavior is.  Would people have as big an issue with government officials and corporate CEO's if  there was not some suspicion that they might be trying to get over in order to manifest goals.  Words like "hypocrites" in the comment arena around this topic, seem to keep coming up.  Better the cold hard truth upfront than deceit?  Well, let's see how things play out in various events over the coming months. In the meantime, let's hope McCain gets those apps updated!...LOL

Take one part tech power-player, one part Capitol Hill, add tax reform discussion, shake; and you've got a major Q&A in Washington, DC that seems to center on Apple and how it does its business but with a larger implication about the corporate tax situation in America today. Seems there may be some sentiment that Apple is dodging paying major taxes, while on the other side it seems that Apple could be encouraged to "re-patriate" some of its mega cash if the U.S. tax laws were different.  Hmm....  Well, the media may have covered everything, even Senator John McCain's question to Apple CEO Tim Cook regarding why his apps always need updating, but no one covers public response like us.  Time to check out what the people have to say about this latest tech visit to D.C....

What Others Are Saying...

And these are the same politicians who push for capitalism, ... hypocrites.

Source:

Apple exploiting an absurdity? An absurdity that Levin and Co. created. An absurdity that Levin is leveragin...

Source:

This is why corporations are not people.  Morality and responsibility are the domain of humans, not corporations.  Corporations have one job... - to make money.  They are entities, detached from humanity.  To expect them to act morally is to expect animals to dance - it is fantasy born of idealism.  You can legislate or not, but you cannot expect them to behave in a way that is detached from their sole purpose.

Source:

Wed, 05/22/2013 - 10:42am

So, what is this really about, after all?  Posturing?  Power?  Manipulation?  Each of these and more plays a role, but at the foundation the discussion around the digital water cooler on this hearing is really about transparency - a value that is becoming more and more deeply ingrained in our society in this era.  People make assumptions about something/someone being "good" or "bad" based on how transparent their behavior is.  Would people have as big an issue with government officials and corporate CEO's if  there was not some suspicion that they might be trying to get over in order to manifest goals.  Words like "hypocrites" in the comment arena around this topic, seem to keep coming up.  Better the cold hard truth upfront than deceit?  Well, let's see how things play out in various events over the coming months. In the meantime, let's hope McCain gets those apps updated!...LOL

Take one part tech power-player, one part Capitol Hill, add tax reform discussion, shake; and you've got a major Q&A in Washington, DC that seems to center on Apple and how it does its business but with a larger implication about the corporate tax situation in America today. Seems there may be some sentiment that Apple is dodging paying major taxes, while on the other side it seems that Apple could be encouraged to "re-patriate" some of its mega cash if the U.S. tax laws were different.  Hmm....  Well, the media may have covered everything, even Senator John McCain's question to Apple CEO Tim Cook regarding why his apps always need updating, but no one covers public response like us.  Time to check out what the people have to say about this latest tech visit to D.C....

What Others Are Saying...

And these are the same politicians who push for capitalism, ... hypocrites.

Source:

Apple exploiting an absurdity? An absurdity that Levin and Co. created. An absurdity that Levin is leveragin...

Source:

This is why corporations are not people.  Morality and responsibility are the domain of humans, not corporations.  Corporations have one job... - to make money.  They are entities, detached from humanity.  To expect them to act morally is to expect animals to dance - it is fantasy born of idealism.  You can legislate or not, but you cannot expect them to behave in a way that is detached from their sole purpose.

Source:

Wed, 05/15/2013 - 1:48pm

Naturally, this is a big topic.  The comment arena has more than its fair share of sentiment against the president and even the "system" overall, while of course supporters of his abound.  But maybe this is about something much deeper.  Not only is this about divisiveness, but also a growing interest in our culture regarding transparency, trust and privacy.  These are three words that you must keep at the forefront during this SmartPower era.  While they are held in such key importance, any slight against them is magnified in an exponential manner and then the subject of great debate.  It's been said that the need for transparency will become so great in society that you better even be wearing clean underwear.  Not sure if things will go that far, but let's just say that those Pinocchio's at WashPo probably won't be retiring any time soon.  Yikes! (what's more, this is happening on an international level and citizens of all countries are exchanging values and becoming more empowered over discussions via digital platforms)

It's all about scandal, and we don't mean the series on ABC television.  Much going on in the comment arena regarding breaking stories this week. As if the Benghazi probe weren't enough, the country has found out that not only has the Internal Revenue Service allegedly improperly targeted conservative groups but also that the Justice Department reportedly collected phone records of reporters from the Associated Press.  Talk about "big government."  Now people are pondering how this will affect President Obama's legacy. IRS, FBI, DOJ, AP - it's all being called Alphabet Soup.  But the real story is in what constituents think.  Let's jump to the comment arena and do our own investigation....

What Others Are Saying...

Obama is now a certified serial liar given 4 Pinnochios yesterday by the Washington Post liberal writer for lies he told that day to the American public.  We cannot trust our President....Obama is now a certified serial liar given 4 Pinocchios yesterday by the Washington Post liberal writer for lies told that day to the American public. We can not trust our President, - See more at: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/05/ap-irs-and-benghazi-scandals-w...

Source:

...In the apologist's view, Obama is and solely responsible for Obama.  The rest of the administration, and its agencies, are Bush's responsibility.Obama is now a certified serial liar given 4 Pinocchios yesterday by the Washington Post liberal writer for lies told that day to the American public. We can not trust our President, - See more at: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/05/ap-irs-and-benghazi-scandals-w...

Source:

The only people that will defend Obama are Blacks... Obama is weak and one of his character flaws is that he can't deal with any criticism and sees anyone as an ENEMY that criticizes him.....

Source:

Fri, 04/26/2013 - 5:59pm

Not surprisingly the comment-sphere is not siding with either party on this issue and questioning those who are running the show more and more frequently.  In an era where flux is the new norm, hi-jacks and hoaxes are part of everyday news; watch for great questioning and concern to arise.  Instability seems to rule now, and as the individual is able to share his/her voice in a greater manner thanks to digital platforms, we could be in for an even more bumpy ride than anything the FAA has encountered in the skies!

Money is always a topic around which the comment-sphere can easily gather.  So, the House just passed a bill to ease air-travel delays caused by the furlough of air-traffic controllers, resolving an issue that had re-ignited debate over federal spending cuts that took effect earlier this year. The bill passed the House on a 361-41 vote. The Senate legislation would give the Transportation Department, budget flexibility to reduce the number of air-traffic controller furloughs, which had caused this week's flight delays. Under the bill, the FAA would be able to redirect as much as $253 million from other areas of its budget to support staffing and operations. President Barack Obama has yet to sign the bill. While the legislators likely improved their chances for on-time flights when they return to work next month, cuts that are harming care for cancer patients, closing children out of preschool and ending food programs for the elderly seem to remain firmly in place. In passing the bill, many Republicans blamed the Obama administration while Democrats argued that the FAA debacle was another reason to replace the sequester. "We're all in this together or we're not," said Republican Peter Welch. "This picking and choosing where the winners continue to be the haves and the losers tend to be the have-nots -- it's just a spiral down, and it's a sad day in Congress that instead of attacking the real problem that we created, we carve out an exception that's going to benefit members of Congress themselves."  Normal staffing returns Sunday. Wanna see what kind of rating constituents gives government via the digital water cooler?  Scroll down!

What Others Are Saying...

... and according to CNN after they passed the bill they all went running to the airport for their weekend recess. Working for the people or self serving millionaires?

Source:

As a frequently flier I feel qualified telling Congress they are a bunch of saps!  The whole point of the sequester is to cause enough pain to force each side to negotiate.  This was not a negotiation.  It was a capitulation. They circumvent the whole process because they can't do what they were elected to do... Today they re-fund the FAA.  Which group gets their money back next week? ...

Source:

Didn't Obeyme say we weren't going to have a sequester?

Source:

Mon, 03/25/2013 - 11:41am

Is it just us or are people seemingly saying that the issue is a bit deeper than the government just putting laws around the parameters of gun sales? In the SmartPower era not only is authority definitely not trusted but there is also greater interest at more effective and thorough problem-solving. The issues around gun-control particularly demonstrate this mind-set.  We'll be continuing to track this in the weeks ahead!

In domestic political news, seems the media can't take their eyes off the gun-control battle.  In his weekly radio address, President Obama discussed his plans for gun control. The Commander-In-Chief has been in talks with the Senate to come to a conclusion about new laws. The NRA has been pushing back against stricter gun laws against multiple states. Senate leader Harry Reid has been reportedly giving President Obama an extremely hard time in coming to a conclusion about gun laws especially on the heels of the Sandy Hook and Aurora incidences. Meanwhile, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is creating a $12 million ad spend regarding gun control.  Let's see what the read is from consistuents....

What Others Are Saying...

If all this energy was applied to actually controlling illegal drugs, gun violence would drop...

Source:

 Gun laws can't prevent all gun deaths...but can save many lives

Source:

 Government is rogue...Naturally, the government wants the guns only in the hands of the criminals.

Source:

Sun, 03/10/2013 - 1:27am

All seem against Rodman on this one.  It's an interesting intersection of the new cold, well let's say lukewarm, shoulder to much of celebrity as we know it as well as demonstrative of the fact that we just don't seem to like our politics and celeb worlds mixing.  Each time it seems to happen and no matter whether it's politicos stepping into the celeb world or vice-versa, the comment-sphere tends to become irked.  Yet, these situations keep taking place, and the stakes seem to get higher.  What does this all actually mean?  Funny, it's been said that politics is celebrity for the unattractive.  While we are not certain that is true, we have to admit that there is a lot of show/theater on both sides making each indistinguishable at times.  This is colliding with the new SmartPower view of life that demands integrity and transparency - a complete opposite of many celebrated figures these days. What's it all mean for you? That as more individuals start owning their impact (a la Rodman), we're going to see some interesting twists and turns come up and continuously change the game - rapidly.  R u ready?

Yet more in the media on Dennis Rodman.  The basketball legend and newly crowned American diplomat says that he will be on his way back to North Korea within the next 6 months. Rodman hopes to broker a peace deal between North Korean Leader, Kim Jong Un and President Barack Obama. The basketball star describes his relationship with the Korean leader as a "friendship". His next trip to the small Asian country will be centered around a kids basketball clinic.  Politicos chime in....

What Others Are Saying...

You guys are stupid...day after he left they announced...missile tests...continue developing nuclear weapons! What worked you idiots?

Source:

He's a has-been...doesn't matter...only way he can get back into the spotlight...He's that type of personality, ...he wilts when he doesn't have a big audience.

Source:

..Rodman is crazy and anything he does is for $ and attention. Why even take him seriously? We...know about the ways of this dictator...America has it's own problems and wrongs.

Source:

Sun, 01/27/2013 - 10:15pm

As flux becomes the new norm and change is the new stability, sentiment around this proposed change by the GOP calls into question both the use of technology as well as the "new America".  What and who should be counted and included is the topic of the day, not only in politics but across the board.  We will continue to see new strategies introduced. Whether the majority are accepted or not will depend on how well they mesh with the new SmartPower ideals of the day.  Stay tuned on this one, kidz!

As of last week, the Republican party has been hashing out a plan to secure that their party has a future. The strategy? The GOP would like to change the system in some states from winner-take-all rules to votes being counted from each congressional district. Right now the system works like this: most states (excluding Nebraska and Maine) in the nation use winner-take-all rules meaning when a presidential candidate wins the majority of the electoral votes for that state they in turn win all of them. The GOP wants to count each individual congressional district so if in the future the half a dozen states that are controlled by Republicans vote democratic as in the last election, the GOP might have a greater chance of securing a place in the future of the US. The plan is being heavily scrutinized by critics who say this is an attempt to unfairly swing votes in the GOP's favor in future presidential elections....What does the public have to say??

What Others Are Saying...

...You do realize that REPUGS get "get 100% of the electoral votes in states where they were only getting around 51 to 55% of total vote" as well don't you?!?...

Source:

The GOP is all about the here and now, damn tomorrow. Everything they do bears this out. Screw minorities, screw the poor, screw the environment, I have mine, what do I care! It's biting them on the ass now, and they're running scared....

Source:

All or nothing was done before technology was able to account for each individual vote. There is no longer a reason for not acknowledging each and every voters cast ballot... Just who gave the democratic and republican [parties] the right to dictate how election votes will be counted in this country? I do not remember this being written in our constitution...

Source:

Thu, 11/08/2012 - 1:12am

This is a loaded one and the main theme of the post-election media analysis.  The comment-sphere is talking right back and, depending on the media outlet, rather in agreement with the concern about the relevancy of Republican values.  However, look out. The last comment, and believe us, that is not the only one of its type, is indicative of fear and concern and the push-back that could take place from that area of emotion.  When shift happens in society, the new are charged with energy.   But that which is falling away is, white-knuckles to hold onto the past with everything it has.  Sensitivity will be needed as we move deeper into a new era that is simply bottom up rather than top down.  But as the change takes place, this is also where the opportunities will lie.  Are you in position to take hold of them?!

  The Republican Party is almost becoming an antiquated term or ideology, according to most media post-election coverage. Being a Republican used to mean a belief in the free market system and the ability of individuals to prosper if they worked hard.  It was the party that freed the slaves under Lincoln, the party that used to be progressive. So much has changed especially given our recent history. It no longer just comes down to wanting a big or small government, there are social issues that expand to even the most nuanced of the left wingers and as seen in this election.  The Republicans didn't seem to grasp the reality of the transcending face of the populace.Obama won primarily all of the minority votes and the young vote, giving him the edge he needed to win in those critical states. Romney won the white male, elderly, and protestant vote but lost all others. Considering his supporters, CNN reports that Romney and the Republican Party are representative of faded generations.Not to mention that liking Obama and being a democrat are considered to be the 'cool' and 'hip' thing to do whereas supporting Romney or being a Republican is considered unfashionable. Pundits say Obama was reelected in spite of a slow and unproductive economy, high unemployment, and inadequate foreign policy initiatives (Libya).  While economy remains on the minds of many, Obama also won because the new America considers its social and civil liberties to be of keen importance. What does this mean for the future of our nation?....

What Others Are Saying...

The Republican Party won't exist in another ten years if they don't stop pretending it's 1950....  The middle is a big place, and they have totally ignored it for ten years now.

Source:

The Democrats have something going for them...social issues. The attacks on women's rights to privacy, reproductive autonomy and fair pay by the current crop of Republicans hurt the party. Ditto their attempts to cast gay people as less than human and unentitled to human rights...Social progress doesn't reverse, no matter how ferociously conservative extremists fight it

Source:

On my side of the country I'll take all the people who voted for Romney....Let's build a wall between us...How long before you Obama takers starve to death? You won't last a month [before] you'll be tunneling under the wall for food. Here's my point - if you keep pushing on conservatives, we'll bail. We're not feeding and housing a bunch of freeloaders. We'll either stop working and become part of the 47%, or we'll leave the country. It's up to you. Either way, you'll starve to death.

Source:

Tue, 08/21/2012 - 12:34am

Anyone else think it's damn weird that men are having these conversations and making decisions about women and their bodies when they have no idea what it could ever feel like to be raped as a woman and/or go through pregnancy (as maybe overall sentiment expressed by Comment 1 below)???  This new development, in addition to what has been said to be a new "war on women" is curious to watch in the age of great flux.  But look closely, this is really about a larger issue of control and dominance and the continual shift from that of those who were in power traditionally.  Sociologists are saying that the shift in male power over females is indicative of further and further signs of disruption. If that is the case, could this be one of the few remaining battle areas and one of the most appropriate, the uterus.  "Throughout history, ideas about  women's bodies have been used to reinforce and/or challenge women's social position," as per this hot link http://www.fwhc.org/roseweitz1.htm  Do check out this cool Infographic of sorts and then think about who you are going to vote for, and why.

Republican Todd Akin, who is running for Missouri Senate, said he opposed abortion after rape because women rarely became pregnant from legitimate rape. Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan said they disagreed with Akin and found his statement insulting. Ryan and Akin co-signed a bill that included the phrase "forcible rape." President Barack Obama said rape is rape and cannot be categorized on different levels. He said he would support abortion for rape victims. Republican now urge Akin to quite the Senate race.  And the people say....

What Others Are Saying...

 Romney can always pull out his Etch-A-Sketch on this ... but Ryan has no way to hide from this - he has always explicitly stated that he opposed abortion in ALL cases, except to save the life of the mother. His attempt at passing an amendment defining a fertilized egg as a person should dispel anyone's notion that Ryan is any less radical than Akin. ... "Small government conservatives" please get out of our bedrooms ... and certainly get out of women's uteruses! ...  

Source:

... Romeny is going to make a hypocrite out of everybody! I'm sure Republican "outrage" is only supplanted by the obsession to "take back America" ...

Source:

... No claim is made about what aspects of the Akin's statement Romney and Ryan disagree with. ... Nor is any claim made about Ryan's view of abortion for rape victims. ... Ryan can remain personally opposed, but the statement effectively creates a different impression. ... 

Source:

Thu, 08/02/2012 - 11:07am

Is it any wonder why Congress' approval rating is as it is?  Interesting that with such divide in our country, here is one area almost everyone seems to agree upon.  Noted political theorist Dr. Benjamin Barber has noted that democracies only continue with both true and constant dialogue/critical analysis and actual timely movement.  Thoughts on the U.S. track record on both those areas?

House of Representatives and Senate leaders John Boehner and Harry Reid announced that they have reached a consensus about a six-month bill to find the federal government. The bill will avoid a possible shutdown three months before the presidential elections. Committee members must now write the legislation, which is to be passed by Congress in September and signed into law by the President. Current funding for federal agencies is due to expire at the end of September. With the new bill, it will continue through March 2013. Now, to the comments!

What Others Are Saying...

Count me as one voter that is sick and tired of the Congress/Senate/President waiting until the last minute to get a budget done. .... Our government officials have been acting like high school students waiting until the night before to do their big report.

Source:

 It's hard to do anything meaningful when over half of Congress is not interested in doing anything but make you look incompetent. ... The executive branch is the weakest of the three. 95% of the things people blame the President, … they should blame on Congress.

Source:

like the Republicans in Congress are people of easy virtue. When it suits them, to hogtie Obama. … Now that they don't want to look bad before an election. … If it were your neighbor that behaved like that, wouldn't you be wary?

Source:

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Democrats

Anyone can collect comments; but only here will you also get irreverent, fun analysis of public opinion!

Take one part tech power-player, one part Capitol Hill, add tax reform discussion, shake; and you've got a major Q&A in Washington, DC that seems to center on Apple and how... more

So, what is this really about, after all?  Posturing?  Power?  Manipulation?  Each of these and more plays a role, but at the foundation the discussion around the... more

Take one part tech power-player, one part Capitol Hill, add tax reform discussion, shake; and you've got a major Q&A in Washington, DC that seems to center on Apple and how... more

So, what is this really about, after all?  Posturing?  Power?  Manipulation?  Each of these and more plays a role, but at the foundation the discussion around the... more

Lots to say on the Tumblr purchase by Yahoo for reportedly $1.1 billion dollars. (yes, you read right).  Yahoo CEO is playing for keeps on this one, and there is much scrutiny... more

Well, the fact that Yahoo has said that they promise not to screw up the deal says a lot about what they already know the general public perception to be of this... more

What's the biggest chatter today in celeb, why, Kanye West, of course.  Not only he still currently a trending topic on Twitter with the release of the album coupled with... more

Issues here of not liking the messenger, liking the message, not liking the message nor the messenger, and so on.  This figure has become quite controversial. ... more