where the SmartPower generation connects

Romney

Sat, 11/10/2012 - 7:32pm

This is interesting. It's not about strength or weakness for the comment soup.  This is about truth or fact, a very important topic in the new times.  Transparency, integrity.  These are the buzz words of today.  In an era where so much has seemingly been manipulated in the past, many believe very little these days.  Professor Piotr Sztompka talks about the "decay of trust" emergence.  He says that as this happens we become "ghettoized"; that is, escaping into enclaves of closeness, security - trusted circles.  How will this affect our society in the long term?  That's what will be fascinating to watch.

A video has hit the cyber-sphere showing President Barack Obama shed a couple of tears during his address to his team at his Chicago campaign headquarters. The tears began to flow as he spoke about having come "full circle" in the election. A president crying is not an act you usually see (that's actually Boehner's vibe), but it shows that the strength has a heart. Nevertheless, some people are question whether it's sincere. Will he shed some more for winning Florida, boosting his votes to 332 in comparison to Governor Mitt Romney's 206? Americans discuss... 

What Others Are Saying...

Oh for pete's sake, of course his crying was sincere. He wasn't playing to some audience that needed to be convinced of his caring for them. He was and is sincere about his staff and about the USA. It's obvious to me!...Walk a mile in his shoes and see where that gets you! A man who can show his emotions of gratitude to his team and his country is a true hero in my book. 

Source:

What a sissy! Just more proof that he is morally weak...

Source:

Why are people watching this video and acting as if Obama was sobbing? Literally, I didn't even know he was tearing up until he finished and wiped the tears from his face.

Source:

Tue, 11/06/2012 - 10:14pm

Now this is interesting. Very telling, and dare we even say an important fact to keep in mind given that it could be a major cause in a further social shift that is already happening.  This is significant because it also dovetails with Google co-founder's plea for whomever wins tonight to immediately become an independent. We'll discuss this in depth in tomorrow's podcast, but the important take-away is:  this election seems to be important because it might just represent one of the last of its style for so very many reasons.  Happy viewing tonite, Kidz.

Election season is finally coming to an end tonight, but will the outcome really make a difference? Some opinion articles across several publications have stated that it won't. According to an editor and columnist from the Deal Book of the NYTimes, whomever wins this time the markets and the country are still going to face an uncertain future. Most businesses and investors will still be shook up over the previous months and hold off on making big moves like expenditures, therefore hiring increases are not likely to ensue. Another commentator from the Atlantic says that nothing extremely radical will change because of the nation's strongly divided congress. Whichever candidate wins, neither of their promises will come to fruition because compromises are unlikely to occur. These examples have been summarized, yes, but the point is still there. Uncertainty will be the forecast for the next couple of years and there's nothing anybody can do about it, even the President. So what does this say about our country if our leaders have no power to change anything? At least voting still gives people hope. Let's see what the nation has to say about this new form of disillusion....

What Others Are Saying...

...Nothing short of revolution -- a peaceful one, to be sure -- will change things.

Source:

Real capitalists refer to uncertainty by its proper name: risk....Those who seek to banish risk are fraidy-capitalists.

Source:

Real capitalists refer to uncertainty by its proper name: risk....Those who seek to banish risk are fraidy-capitalists.

Source:

Mon, 10/29/2012 - 7:10pm

Ah, the sarcasm.  Sandy as conspiracy.  Sandy as moneypit... and more.  Is even Mother Nature political?  The comment arena seems to think so, or is at least making it so.  This is about lack of trust, lack of belief.  This type of thought is almost ubiquitous in a time where flux is the new norm.  Seeing is not even necessarily believing once so many people have been mislead and side-tracked.  This sentiment will most definitely grow before it levels out. Winners will anticipate this and offer a new way of showing value and proof even before it is asked.  Watch....  

Most news outlets agree, the wildcard that is Hurricane Sandy has definitely thrown a wrench into election season. With the big day eight days away, what exactly does this mega-storm mean for voters out there? Mother Jones along with other publications reported the many factors that could lead to a major swing in the election. Incumbents usually don't do as well when there is unfavorable weather conditions regardless of that being completely out of the president's control. On the other hand, incumbents can improve their overall ratings based on how they handle these conditions. So it really is just up to Obama if he can swing the polls in his favor. As of right now, Romney does have the lead in some major swing states but that doesn't really mean anything. Obama does have another disadvantage in these states though. Since they are being directly affected by Sandy, early voter turnout will drastically decrease and that could be bad for the Democrats due to the campaign's reliance on early voting. What do people have to say about what could possibly the worst collection of events to converge in history....

What Others Are Saying...

...Sandy is being driven ashore by the government. They've had hurricane-driving technology for decades, dont'cha know.... 

Source:

I hope Obama will be as magnanimous as Bush and McCain were in 2008. Surely Obama is aware he could still run again...if Romney is the monster so many of you believe he is, then Obama may arise again in 2016...

Source:

...let us ignore 4 straight years of utter failure because the wind blows.   One thing's for sure, this president knows how to spend other people's money...so it can be expected that the east coast to the Mississippi will be declared a disaster zone....

Source:

Sun, 10/28/2012 - 7:18pm

Polls are so tricky, aren't they?  Does one ever really know?  If MIT just recently did a study that showed that claims that one can use Twitter to predict election results are flawed, then how do we know that polls are really any more truthful/accurate?  The fact that there is a bunch of chatter about this in the comment arena points to yet more value on transparency and accuracy  that is placed in this new era. Take note!

According to an Ohio New Organization poll, Governor Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama appear tied at 49% among likely voters. The biggest change is Romney's lead with male voters having increased from 1 percentage point to 12 points. With 27 electoral votes, Ohio is seen as the largest battleground state, and both parties are campaigning furiously. What are Americans saying about this battleground state tie?

What Others Are Saying...

...there is one area in which the incumbent appears to have a big advantage: those who have already cast their ballots.  Obama leads Romney by 59 percent to 31 percent among early voters, according to Reuters/Ipsos polling data compiled in recent weeks.  7% have already voted.  That is 7 million according to the average 100 million that vote in a Presidential election...These folks have already voted...More than the Romney camp can say!

Source:

The media is blitzing with this story from Fox ...What better time to pull out a story based on  data taken mostly from pre debate polls when Romney was leading. It's a distraction from the real polls that have Obama ahead. And attempt to discourage voters. Will the GOP stop at nothing?

Source:

....The relevant news about this poll is that 80% of the surveys were conducted before the final debate, so this is last week's poll. Old news. For some reason, they only decided to publish it today. I don't quite understand the reasoning behind this.

Source:

Wed, 10/24/2012 - 12:04am

Funny that aside from a few Obama zingers, many we spoke to thought that this debate was a bit of a yawn-fest.  The candidates were even seated the entire time.  But the comment arena was definitely watching and contemplating.  Funny that even though the candidates tried to work to ti in foreign policy with jobs and the U.S. economy, there were not many direct comments on it signaling that the public doesn't connect the dots on these issues and thinks of them in silos, or what?  At its core, the debates may signal what American culture values so very much:  the spirit of competition and winners.  This seems to be the heart of us, as a people.  Choosing sides, making strong judgments, audience as fans.  But could we be focusing more on the game rather than who is actually being played?

Regardless of what either party is saying, one fact is clear about last night's debate - the President came out swinging, and by most media reports his strategy worked. The topic was foreign policy, and the president used his personal experiences as an advantage against his republican opponent. A CNN poll has Obama winning by about 8 percent, well within the margin of error. Another poll conducted by CBS finds Obama leading tremendously by 53 percent with Romney getting only 23 and the other 24 percent going to a tie. It was reported the democratic incumbent lost some points in overall likability, a spot where the president always seems to shine,  because he was more on the attack the entire night. But those points just came to even out with Romney. The polls are not the election though, so what does this mean for the final two weeks of campaigning? Let's turn to the comment polls to find out..

What Others Are Saying...

...[Romney's] "goal" was to make sure he keeps fooling the rest of America....[He] ended up largely AGREEING with Obama's current policies. In other words, Romney admits that HIS ideas are bad and Obama's are good. 

Source:

...We have witnessed severely conservative Mitt, moderate Mitt, pants on fire Mitt, irate Mitt, ...mellow Mitt and last night we finally got a glimpse of AGREEABLE Mitt!...

Source:

[What was] the only net effect of the Obama Romney debate?... A huge surge in future Ron Paul voters I'd say.

Source:

Sat, 10/20/2012 - 8:32pm

More fuel to the fire, here.  So this gives the comment arena more to discuss fo' sho'.  It's interesting because from a sociology perspective it is said that augmenting someone's name create relationship, no matter whether the name be changed in a flattering or non-flattering way.  They can create a specific place of vulnerability, but the interesting thing here is that this has not only made for vulnerability for Romney but for Obama at the same time, as it opens up yet another avenue for criticism.   We're just wondering if the Romney camp will come up with yet an even better zinger using the Obama name?  Hmmmm.......

Obama told a crowd of 9,000 people in Washington that he was concerned about Romney, "I mean, he's changing up so much and backtracking and sidestepping, we've got to name this condition that he's going through. I think it's called 'Romnesia'". Biden also spoke about this 'condition' in Florida, and claimed that Paul Ryan has contracted this "communicable disease" as well. The Romney camp has dismissed this as today's "new gimmick". Gimmick, or not, does it hold any truth as Romney attempts to move cover all of his bases?

What Others Are Saying...

Doctor's appointment scheduled for November 6, 2012 - voters are his best doctors when voters REJECT him, Mitt disappears from our view, and Mitt is cured...And so are we for that matter!

Source:

They are both swine! You have Osama bin Biden versus Comney-ist blaming each other...The government is a series of checks and balances so blame can go around evenly!

Source:

I feel ashamed to call Obama our President. A president should be someone we can respect and be proud of not someone who bullies and stoops so low that they have to come up with these comments, or should I say name calling, just like a child, to try to get to peoples vote. Shame on you Obama, you are an adult and the President, act like one...

Source:

Thu, 10/11/2012 - 8:48pm

Never has one bird had so much mention in such a short a time span.  But what's really going on here (besides childhood sentiment)? Could it be said that this bird is taking on larger symbolism for all those who feel a bit awkward and vulnerable who then become targets of the system?  Perhaps.  But what is most interesting is how the yellow icon is used to actually create a cascade of conversation around larger issues from which the original stems.  One thing is certain, foreign countries must be looking at the Big Bird references and wondering what the whole fuss is about?  Let's see what icons, if any, surface during the VP debates.....

The puppets and people making up Sesame Street disagree with the use of Big Bird in recent anti-Romney ads made by the Obama campaign. The owners of Sesame Street said they never granted permission to use the character and they have asked those responsible to pull all further  usage of the beloved yellow bird from political advertisements. The ad was a response to a statement Romney said during the recent presidential debate. The republican candidate stated he would cut federal spending to PBS, deeming it unnecessary because of the economic state the country is in, although he admitted to liking Big Bird. Democrats behind the ad believe the retort was necessary in order to prove that Mitt's primary choice to cut federal spending to PBS is a ridiculous decision and position to have. On the other hand, conservatives find this a childish and desperate attempt to distract voters from what the real issues are under the Obama administration.

What Others Are Saying...

Obama got rejected by a PUPPET!...it doesn't get more pathetic than that.

Source:

(This ad) is a great illustration of Romney's priorities...He wants to cut PBS funding which barely puts a dent in the federal budget...but he wants to allow handouts to his corporate buddies..

Source:

This really is an insignificant point to raise over one sentence Romney said. The economy is going to hell in a handbasket and Obama is using precious political capital on this irrelevant crappola.

Source:

Thu, 10/04/2012 - 9:55pm

The below shows us that both personality and, obviously, that fact it's important to be able to make a good argument are what really matter to those who watched and commented.  Interesting that even though much of the media has talked also about the format and moderator, those elements barely show up near center stage for the commerati. And who knew that Big Bird/Sesame Street would be what really caught the attention of most, taking Romney well into today via Trending Topics and more?!  Forget jobs, it's about childhood puppet poultry!  LOL  In this day and age where every one can broadcast, publish and more; to stand out in debates and capture the comment-sphere it seems like unexpected spontaneity is where engagement happens.  We can hardly wait to see Biden vs. Ryan!

Last night was a crucial night for the Romney campaign to turn the polls around. On the eve of debate night and the recent negative favoring of Romney in most Battleground states such as Ohio and Nevada, the republican party needed a big comeback from their candidate...And they got one. Most publications and pundits today agree that Mitt Romney won the first presidential debate reporting that although he wasn't very specific on issues such as tax reform, the former Mass. Governor's overall body language and talking points against Obama portrayed him as the better debater. Now pundits wonde what will this mean for the election? Let's turn to the commentsphere to determine what the public is thinking...

What Others Are Saying...

We cannot keep doing the same thing and expect different results. We need REAL change... Real Expertise in the White House. Romney/Ryan 2012 

Source:

I support Obama, but I cringed at his lack of fire, and zero charisma. Romney lied... did whatever it took to appear Presidential.

Source:

Who wins the debates will have little bearing on the election. What the debates do show and reveal is, what an incompetent, clueless, professorial, narcissistic president we currently have in the White House.

Source:

Sat, 09/15/2012 - 1:13pm

More class warfare?  Looks like Mitt has placed himself in yet more hot water with this statement.  Reminds us of a French goverment official not long ago who was asked the price of a baguette and was so far out of touch that the amount quoted was laughable.  What happens in a society when those who wish to run it are not aware of the intricacies of the society itself? This may not really be about criticizing Romney in as much as it's about being cautious about options that appear when choices provided seem incompetent or irrelevant.  There's a hot article on economic gap (since the French Revolution!) between politicians and constituents in "The New York Times" from a few months ago.  Will such/are such patterns being questioned now in the new era?

In an interview on ABC's Good Morning America, Mitt Romney argued that he would not raise taxes on middle income Americans, leading show host George Stephanopoulos to question whether Romney's definition of middle income consisted of individuals making between $30,000 and $100,000. Romney replied that middle income, in his opinion, is actually between $200,000 and $250,000, which in reality is actually in the top 2 or 3 percent. The Romney campaign team later clarified, saying that Romney's numbers were actually for household income, not individual income. What are Americans saying about this gaffe, and how it relates to his party position?

What Others Are Saying...

That is not, nor is it near, "middle income" by any possible reasonable definition. Mitt Romney's world view is severely off-center, and his identification is with people a lot richer and greedier than you and me...he was born with a silver spoon, and never had to pay tuition, a student or mortgage loan, or for medical bills. He is out of touch with reality.

Source:

"Wow! I'm poverty and didn't even know it! Thanks Mitt!"

Source:

I went to college, i have my master's, i got a job doing what i love, but guess what? I don't make $250,000 a year! People in my field of work are significantly underpaid. This guy lives in an elite little dream world...just because i don't make $250,000 a year does not mean I'm some slacker with a minimum wage job that does not have any ambition!

Source:

Fri, 08/31/2012 - 2:42pm

Not surprising, the comment-sphere reflects the division of the country.  Acceptance speeches such as these typically seem anti-climatic.  It's all about formality in an era where less and less formality reigns. As the SmartPower tribe continues to re-define the social dynamic between us, watch for more shift in such spectacle that does not give new thinkers what it really wants.

The Massachusetts Republican accepted the nomination of his party as its nominee for president this Thursday evening, thereby being the first Mormon to achieve such a position. In his speech, Romney emphasized the need to 'turn the page', and highlighted that President Obama's time is over, and has been over for a while. Now Romney is in a two month sprint to November 6th. So how are Americans feeling about this nomination and, more importantly, its implications?

What Others Are Saying...

Did you expect him to say no? It was a done deal befroe he got there, what a joke the convention is...it's a pep rally not a nomination vote. The system is broken...so why spend the millions just to pat yourself on the back...This is who is going to save us money...Please!

Source:

Mitt and the GOP got it right...wish we could move fast forward to November 6th and vote out Obama...Mitt has the resume, whereas Obama was a plant by the democrats to see how America could be brainwashed with 'hope and change' while hiding the candidate's background which is STILL hidden 4 years later...I am looking forward to see the hit movie of 2016: Obama's America.

Source:

Romney's speech was a substanceless dud. I wanted to hear what he intended to do with social security and medicare. I heard nothing...an abosolute zero.

Source:

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Romney

Anyone can collect comments; but only here will you also get irreverent, fun analysis of public opinion!

It's all about scandal, and we don't mean the series on ABC television.  Much going on in the comment arena regarding breaking stories this week. As if the Benghazi probe weren... more

Naturally, this is a big topic.  The comment arena has more than its fair share of sentiment against the president and even the "system" overall, while of course... more

Much chatter on race today after Soledad O'Brien comes clean on her thoughts about feedback to her past "Black In America" documentary series on CNN.  Seems that during a talk... more

It should come as no surprise that the comments on this one are fairly true to whom the media outlet caters.  We selected a "liberal" one, a "conservative" one and... more

While the Benghazi witch hunt is probably the most-reported in political news today, we thought we'd bring the #2 item instead (because we're sure you can guess the comments... more

Ah, this should be a good one.  As we watch the further intertwining of the political world and Hollywood, the responses are key on this bit of entertainment.  The... more

In what most be one of the more comical tech-related news pieces of the day, the Newt Gingrich call for re-naming the magical device known as the cell phone has the comment... more

So, a couple of interesting insights from tracking the comments.  One, this fast becomes a conversation about Republicans versus Democrats even among tech bloggers... more