Mon, 10/29/2012 - 11:06pm
The comment-sphere likes to question and examine. "Let's not jump to conclusions" might be the mantra from the below. This seems to be a bit troubling because much of the mainstream comment arena tends to keep dismissing and invalidating the continued talking points around lack of equal representation in a U.S. society that is growing increasingly brown. If Caucasians and males primarly direct the view, then could that view possibly skewed? If so, what does that do in terms of informing a culture. It seems that from the below people are tiring of reports and stats which can be interpreted in different ways. Are they asking to get at the root of what is really going on instead and having larger, deep discussions about it rather than dancing around it with disparity reports. Most people know what the offices and newsrooms and boardrooms of the world look like anyway. Perhaps what we are seeing here the request for cessation of stats and the inauguration of a new and actual approach? If so, could this be around the corner?
More than 93 percent of the front-page presidential election related stories are written by white reporters, new data shows, which looked into the newsrooms of 38 newspapers in all of U.S. Asian American reporters have 3.3 percent of the stories, black reporters - 2.9 percent, and Latino reporters 0.7 percent. The only exception appears to be The Dallas Morning News where 18.8 percent of the articles were written by black reporters. The paper with the most Latino reporters as authors of the election stories is The New York Times at 3 percent. Authors of the research find as striking the fact that Latinos are the most under-represented considering they are the second largest population group in the U.S. Even The Miami Herald, which has a 27 percent Hispanic staff has no front page articles about the election written by Hispanic reporters. Let's see what the comment arena has to say about these stats.
What Others Are Saying...