where the SmartPower generation connects

race

Tue, 05/14/2013 - 11:07am

It should come as no surprise that the comments on this one are fairly true to whom the media outlet caters.  We selected a "liberal" one, a "conservative" one and one that targets Black women.  Clearly, we are not in a post-racial society but rather one that is examining race.  But make no mistake, this issue is really about power. As we watch the plurality of our nation widen, fears abound, issues come up, and tug-of-wars are had.  What's so important here is how statements will be made so that people can actually hear the concern and have intelligent discussion around them.  A journalist should probably no better than phrasing is everything, but this also might be why so many of the commenters - whether pro or against - labeled her docs as more or less fluff.  Depth of context and logic will play key roles as the race discussion heats up.  Only those who really make sense will be heard in the SmartPower era given that it is one that demands more complete show of thought than in previous time. In the meantime, wonder if Soledad will end up with a cushy job at Harvard now that the CNN gig is over.  Inquiring minds want to know!

Much chatter on race today after Soledad O'Brien comes clean on her thoughts about feedback to her past "Black In America" documentary series on CNN.  Seems that during a talk given by her at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, she says that many Caucasians have told her that the series is divisive.  Her response?   "I was like, again, 'OK, white person, this is a conversation you clearly are uncomfortable with, and I have no problem seeing race, and I think we should talk about race."  This statement alone has touched a nerve in the comment arena.  Oh, they have no problem talking about race there.  Let's see just a snapshot of what they have to say about this news item.

What Others Are Saying...

She's saying everything that most of us have known for years. Until white folks can stop saying we're pulling a card..., conversations like this will continue. The world is very different if you are BLACK IN AMERICA or any other minority, you'll never understand. The things we face, you will never get because you choose not to have that dialogue.(RESPONSE)I choose to NOT have the dialogue with an opportunist white-skinned woman parading as Aunt Jemima...

Source:

I’m sorry, Ms. O'brien, but there is a problem with your Race Card®. It’s been declined. It's badly overdrawn. Perhaps you could actually try to make a relevant argument instead...

Source:

...Shouldn’t we be happy someone of her stature is taking a risk and is using her platform to speak on race/call the white privilege out.

Source:

Thu, 04/25/2013 - 3:47pm

My beef with the comments said on the air by John King was not so much about the possibility of race baiting but, from what source and how reliable? My goodness, a day when CNN was a laughing stock with reporting a fluid bomb story in Boston and making such amateurish disclosures is incomprehensible. Never mind how Jon Stewart's, ' The Daily Show' parody of such a clown show and how, even Ms.Susan Candiotti made such a ridiculous metaphor with her reporting of, how eerie silent the streets were in Watertown, 'it's as though, a bomb had dropped off somewhere?' At least Stewart's show is comedy but, CNN is not and for King to have said, what he said, is inexcusable-in light of his past screw ups and losing his show. Why, John?! Just to get credit for being the first, at all costs? Go f

Echoes in the comment arena regarding this latest CNN gaffe.  The news network has come under harsh criticism after reporter John King, a senior correspondent at CNN, wrongly described the Boston Marathon bombing suspect as a “dark-skinned male”.  Both suspects, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, brothers of Chechnyan descent, turned out to be white-complexion, a fact that has drawn criticism from civil rights leaders and even fellow journalists who described King’s reporting as irresponsible and racially inflammatory. As we all know now, Dzhokhar is was just transferred from the hospital to prison, and brother Tamerlan died amidst a gun battle while running from police. “The fact that this information was false is only part of the problem,” said NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous in a statement. “Our concern is that CNN used an overly-broad, unhelpful and potentially racially inflammatory categorization to describe the potential suspect. History teaches us that too often people of color are unfairly targeted in the aftermath of acts of terrorism.” It seems that CNN has yet to issue a statement in response to the criticism. Typically, when a reporter makes an extreme mistake, the station or news agency will take responsibility for issuing an apology. CNN has not said why it feels exempt from the professional protocol. But King has vehemently defended himself, according to Twitter posts reported by Richard Prince’s Journal-isms. “ ‘Source of that description was a senior government official. And I asked, are you sure? But I’m responsible. What I am not is racist." Hmmm...let's see if the public agrees with that.

What Others Are Saying...

When I heard the “dark-skinned male” comment, I NEVER thought it was a black male. I thought the speaker was unable to identify the person’s RACE. He would have SAID “black male,” if he had been talking about an African American male, and that’s all there is to it. It’s a matter of semantics. White people use the term “dark” and “light” when referring to themselves as well...

Source:

My beef with the comments said on the air by John King was not so much about the possibility of race baiting but, from what source and how reliable?... a day when CNN was a laughing stock with reporting a fluid bomb story in Boston and making such amateurish disclosures is incomprehensible...

Source:

Offensive not at all...SAD to think in a situation such as this was that when all reports were "Officially" unclear and coming in at a rapid rate, that someone with John King's great reputation should fall victim to such closed mindedness. "Dark Skin" is a description...and under the circumstances of this magnitude...I got it...That could mean many Nationalities, Italian, Mexican, Indian, Middle Eastern, certainly not necessarily Black... people seems like you really keep the Racism going...don't you! When will you stop and think first...before you react and post ignorant comments...

Source:

Tue, 04/16/2013 - 11:16am

So, it seems like the media got it wrong on this one too because public sentiment seems to sway overwhelmingly in the not-offended category.  Could it be true what many have said?  The media tends to encourage separatism?  Perhaps.  This is why it is very important, particularly when it comes to race, to view popular opinion rather than that of hand-picked "pundits" expressing certain views tied to certain agenda.  But what this Barbie incident also does is provide the digital town hall with another reason to discuss what is and isn't appropriate as we move into a new race theory for a new era.  We'll continue to watch!  When CNN just isn't enough, it's all about glassldc.com

The comment arena is still buzzing about this one!  Mattel has released a new Barbie, and she is Mexican. While kids may still enjoy playing with her, adults see problems and controversy. The goal of the toy company is to boost intercultural understandings. What backfires in this idea are the accessories Barbie carries with her -- a passport, a hairless dog, a Mexican bass guitar which is seen as stereotypical and racist by many.  The passport looks to be the most offensive item because, some argue, it refers to many Mexicans being undocumented in the U.S. Other dolls in the international collection, however, also have passports. Yikes.  Let's see how people feel about the situation.

What Others Are Saying...

... Nobody finds these dolls offensive ... The "community" making the most noise about this controversy is the Ultra Sensitive White Liberal PC Police. Just look at how far they had to dip into obscurity to get a quote from a "Mexican-American". ... I come from a city that is over 90% Hispanic ...I am a South Texas Hispanic, and I just bought two of these dolls for my sisters.

Source:

its not like they dressed the barbie like a maid with exaggerated butt features and with a ton of babies hanging off of her. good lord. i think shes pretty

Source:

... The idea that Mexico's dog has been singled out seems absurd. ... Would they have preferred Barbie be accompanied by her friendly pet chupacabra?

Source:

Wed, 04/10/2013 - 4:01pm

Whoa.  Racial exploration + music = very strong public opinion, in this case.  Artistic merit aside (and, yes, this has come up in the comments as well), many people don't seem to get the tongue-in-cheekness of this collabo.  It's also opened these celebs up for greater personal probing (which is a larger trend we are seeing in celebrity, overall).  Our country is clearly very sensitized to race.  Dialogue is definitely being initiated due to the lyrics of this song.  Thing is, is it really getting us anywhere?  It is interesting how entertainment continues to be one of the major forces in creating discussion around race and ethics.  And the comment arena will continue to pick up on this.  Forget the "pundits".  The real action is on the Web observing what real people think, particularly when it comes to race!

Seems there is something that has digital commenters in  foul mood.  Recording artists Brad Paisley and LL Cool J have released a duet combining country music and hip hop, entitled "Accidental Racist". The song plays off the stereotypes of a "white man comin' to you from the southland" and someone "livin' in the hood". It makes prideful references towards the confederate flags, du-rags, and saggy pants. Though the intentions of the song was to help end racism, it seemed to spark the opposite reaction by the lyrics playing into typical stereotypes. "Accidental Racist" is receiving backlash from news outlets and listeners. Paisley defend his song by explaining that it was about "two guys that believe in who they are and where they're from very honestly having a conversation and trying to reconcile."  Let's see if people understand the song's intent....

What Others Are Saying...

Two of the biggest names in the music industry have come together with their unique creativity to bring this chart climbing hit to the top.... Paisley’s soothing drawl and country sound blends seamlessly with LL Cool J’s hard hitting, straight from the hood rhymes, knocking everyone out, even mama.

Source:

The song is so horrible I'm hesitant to even take it seriously, because I'm wondering if they might have been trying to punk all of us...

Source:

LL Cool J making a song combating racism while simultaneously starring in the most racist program on television that if you would believe everything they say, every single terrorist is Muslim and Arab and that every single Arab and Muslim is terrorist....

Source:

Sat, 03/30/2013 - 2:24pm

One thing is definitely apparent: we are living in a time where the concept of race, thoughts and speech around it is highly scrutinized.  Some people see the lightheartedness in Gottlieb's statement, some not.  It is interesting, though, that the media actually seemed to blow this up more than it actually bothered most people.  This should make us wonder, how much does the media contribute to keeping us "segregated" and highly sensitive.  Further, it is because we still have not addressed so much deep history between African-Americans and Caucasians in this country that even the smallest comment can ruffle feathers.  Thing is, why is race  - whether a joke or not  - a front-of-mind commment for Gottleib.  Is he uncomfortable seeing what has typically been the norm in reporting being flipped?  Does he, like so many people in the U.S. as our country browns, feel maybe just a bit threatened?  If so, how is that addressed?  What is the impact? These are actually the types that these types of incidences can start.  Something to think about, no?  In the meantime, I guess we'd just say:  let the games begin!

Caught this in the media earlier this week? NCAA men's basketball analyst Doug Gottlieb certainly made quite a first impression as he joined co-hosts Greg Gumbel, Kenny Smith, Greg Anthony and Charles Barkley in studio for the CBS pregame show the other night. Introduced by Gumbel, Gottlieb made an awkward diversity joke that left all four of his African-American co-hosts shaking their heads. "Cream rises to the crop. I don't know why you guys asked me, I'm just here to bring diversity to the set here. Give the kind of white man's perspective on things from the point guard position."  According to the Associated Press, Gottlieb issued a statement later Thursday night through CBS. "It was not a smart thing to say and I apologize," he said.  Think the comment-sphere wil accept the apology? 

What Others Are Saying...

... at least 90% of us were not offended by Gottlieb's joke. It's that last 10% or even less that is holding society back and needs to calm down. What is with this trend of being hyper-critical of and hyper-sensitive to JOKES? Race is always a touchy subject, but there was no hatred or bigotry in Gottlieb's words.

Source:

By saying that he is not the "kind of guy" that can get away with it is racist. Anyone should have been able to say that joke. I actually laughed when i heard it but immediately shook my head in seeing Barkley and Gumble's reaction...

Source:

It certainly SOUNDS funny when you read it, but delivery is another thing. And apparently, since it fell flat on the broadcast, he didn't do it very funny...But offensive? Eh, I'm not white, so I guess I can't be a very good judge of that. But I think anyone with a sense of humor understands the attempt...

Source:

Wed, 03/27/2013 - 10:05am

It looks like the commenters are having less confusion with the situation than the media, which actually makes us wonder what part the media plays in slowing change/maintaining status quo.  As it questions if the Pope is actually Latino, people seem to already have the question answered.  Is it more that traditionalists fear/resist change (such as a first Hispanic pope) that they try furiously to find details that can assist them in grasping to what is accepted rather than something that is new.  As we see more people of color enter into more "firsts", racial background, preconceptions and theory will be discussed and dissected.  It just may be about time!

Pope Francis, the newly elected leader of modern Catholicism has recently been under heavy criticism. Many are wondering whether or not the new Pope, who was born to Italian immigrants but raised in Argentina can be considered the first Latino Pope. The argument unveils the unsettling truth that race matters still permeate through religion. Pope Francis does not appear to mind at all, continuing to immerse himself in his new position. Does race still really matter, or are we blowing things out of proportion?  To the comment arena!

What Others Are Saying...

Ethnicity?... Where you were born makes you a citizen of that country. I was born in the United States of parents of Irish/Italian descent. That doesn't make me an Irish/Italian/American. It makes me an American...the pope was born in Argentina he is Argentinian.

Source:

...American society is so obsessed with the need to categorize people into ethnic groups? Pope Francis is a typical italian descendant argentine citizen.

Source:

Latino means you primarily speak a Latin language like spanish or Italian!Latino is not a race...has nothing to do with race!

Source:

Wed, 03/20/2013 - 5:43pm

Overwhelming a "nay" on this one.  Clearly Jada's world is different from most, but she can't be that out of touch with the public to realize that most Black women do not think that they are represented fairly and consistently enough in the U.S. to give up what few urban media cover outlets there are - at least that is what the comment-sphere is showing.  Or is it more about provocation, in general?  This whole incident shows that almost anything race-related will get traction and attention.  These spurts of conversation give quick, albeit shallow, avenues for conversations that would not otherwise be had.  The interesting thing here is that the comment-arena gets more to the root of the issue (citing economic disparity, etc) moreso than Pinkett herself, and therein lies the real heart of the matter.  Until people begin to actually admit that there are invisible barriers/inequalities, address why they persist and how it affects people economically (and, therefore, quality of life), we'll have a discussion about race that goes around and around in a circle.  We have to say, though, a very hot media move on her part today - and she didn't even need the media to do it.  Her social media page was enough.  SmartPower in action?  Now, that's a definite yay!

Mrs. Will Smith is the latest celebrity to speak out on the color divide and race matters in Hollywood. The five foot firecracker has issued a call to action for all major African-American magazines and publications to open their covers to Caucasian women, in the same form that predominately Caucasian publications have been opening their covers to women of all ethnicities so that race barriers are less prevalent. Pinkett-Smith took to her Facebook page in order to pose the thought-provoking idea to the public; she even provided examples using a mock cover of Cosmopolitan with America's sweetheart Queen Latifah on the cover, and a mock cover of Essence with academy-award winner Charlize Theron on the cover. This call to action comes on the heels of the unexpected firing of Essence's editor-in-cheif, Constance C. R. White, over conflicting ideas with Essence's board of directors about the editorial direction of the publication. Seems like Mrs. Pinkett-Smith has quite a lot to say! What say you? 

What Others Are Saying...

...a question Jada should pose to white magazines...Apart from Michelle Obama being on Vogue's cover, I can't remember that last time I saw a woman who looks like me...on the cover of an American fashion magazine...you want us to share our covers with white women despite us not having that many covers to share...can't be serious.

Source:

No, Jada. No more dilution of the cause for nothing in return...already lent Martin, Medgar, and Emmit's legacy to gay marriage...and after all that all we have to show for it is the highest unemployment in America...Things are going backwards for blacks in America...Less black women on Essence just means less Black women shining on magazine covers.

Source:

...I doubt many White actresses would want to appear on the cover of a Black woman's magazine for fear of the PR nightmare...not to mention wondering what her presence on the cover would mean. Nice try Jada, but bad idea...

Source:

Tue, 03/19/2013 - 5:26pm

Oh, my.  Well, we've said it before, and we'll say it again:  the U.S. is in desperate need of a new race theory, and the comment arena seems to show that the clunky approach is just not cutting it.  But is it possible to begin true dialogue about race without first being honest and examining roots of beliefs, rather than quick finger pointing.  That just may be what this overall event demonstrates.  We just may have a long way to go on this one, Folks.  But as long as extreme views on race make for ratings (particularly on certain cable news programs), don't look for that to be an ideal platform for deep discussion and new paths to a better view.

A conservation group called "Frederick Douglass Republicans" recently held a tcalled "Trump the Race Card" The talk was supposed to be about Republicans overcoming their issues with race, where K. Carl Smith, the founder of the organization, insisted that, by associating themselves with the slave-turned-Republican politicians, white conservatives can trump the race card. The event didn't go exactly as planned when Scott Terry of North Carolina made the statement "Fredrick Douglass should have been grateful for the food and shelter provided by his former slave master." This resulted in dropped jaws and a failed event. But it has reverberated throughout the news and been the subject of many comments.  Let's take a peep.

What Others Are Saying...

If he's just that stupid to ignore all the racial code the right thinks we don't know about... fine, but it's very plausible that he was there to deliberately say that to derail the panel by throwing all the code talkers into a panic by saying what they all actually believe. What they worry about is other people in the room ... to shout "white power," because they're tired of the pretense.

Source:

it's going to be impossible for then to ever get minority support for at least 20 years. they ran the southern strategy for the last 45 years. it is now ingrained in the base. ... these older people are going to have to die out before change in the GOP can really happen.

Source:

... As a white person I ask what does he mean, "my people"? He is a racist parading as an educated forward thinking human...

Source:

Fri, 03/01/2013 - 1:29pm

Stereotypes, technology, marriage - these themes are recurrent when it comes to comments about this topic.  This is about not only re-evaluating a value system but also how that is intertwined with an out-dated race theory in the U.S. as well.  What might be the most interesting about this is how each commenter thinks his/her little microcosm is indicative of the entire macrocosm. They know it all, without any statistics and facts.  This is part of the issue when dealing with the race-income issue.  Woe is us, if we don't find more efficient ways of communicating about these issues!

A new report has the media buzzing. The income of African-American families has increased somewhat overtime, but white families continue to earn significantly more. This is the conclusion of a study by the Institute on Assets and Social Policy at Brandeis University. The reports say that the gap between white and African-American family wealth increased from $85,070 in 1984 to $236,500 in 2009.The study also found that homeownership is the biggest difference in racial wealth inequality because white families are more likely to have help from relatives increasing their home equity. Income is second.  Has this hit the radar of the general public, and if so, what is sentiment?

What Others Are Saying...

Could differences in family structure contribute to this gap? Married couples tend to do better financially than singles. ... Fewer blacks marry compared to whites, and more babies are born out of wedlock among blacks than whites. ...

Source:

... The property value in my neighborhood has declined ever since more blacks and minorities started moving in. ... They don't like doing yardwork, and won't even hire the Mexicans to do it for them. ... They move in, let the house and yard get run down ... And the reason Blacks have a problem getting raises or promotions is because most of them don't deserve it. All the ones I have ever worked with, spend more time trying to figure out how to get out of doing their job ... Then if they get fired over it, it's always because they were black. ... 

Source:

...The real problem is technology. We have a society in which there is a highly paid class of heavily qualified people and those at the bottom who can't earn a living wage by doing menial jobs like they could before. The solution is Basic Income ...

Source:

Wed, 02/27/2013 - 1:41pm

The examination of race relations and race theory in the United States, is synonymous with this incident; and even a year later, it is far from resolved.  The interesting thing is that the most honest discussions and concerns seem to take place over digital media (and, of course, privately).  Certainly, it's all very multi-layered.  As with most of our stories and public opinion reporting on race, we see questioning from people as the value shift takes place in the SmartPower era. What's right?  What's appropriate?  What needs to change from the past and how?  We'll see more of this come up as more news events take place.  Warning signs?  Let's see. 

The media has turned its eye to the anniversary of the Trayvon Martin killing which is marked during this week. Martin's parents are asking people to remember him by wearing a hoodie during a candlelight vidil at night in New York. Actor Jamie Foxx has also been vocal. In the controversial case, George Zimmerman, a white man of Hispanic descent, who said he killed the teenager, who was Black, in self-defense after Martin was acting suspicious. Zimmerman's lawyers were denied a request to delay his murder trial, which is to begin in June. The case sparked a national debate on racial profiling. Zimmerman was charged with a probable cause affidavit stating he "profiled" Martin. The public weighs in....

What Others Are Saying...

... Martin family ... started a foundation ... to STOP violence and went all the way to New York to hold a vigil for him. They didn't do it Miami where there has been 7 shootings in the last week. Is it because it was black on black crime and there was no money to be made?

Source:

This is the story of a desperate man, bent to prove himself The Real Victim, one fixated on his stature as an un-uniformed, unofficial, self-appointed law-enforcer, unwilling to give any credence to a completely innocent kid ... an innocent kid who had no chance against a man with a gun and likely predisposed to use it. ... This is the story of an armed vigilante.

Source:

The thing that has surprised me ... is how many people have been willing to overlook and/or manipulate the facts to make Zimmerman look like a hero ... Nothing has made me understand how active racism still is in America.

Source:

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - race

Anyone can collect comments; but only here will you also get irreverent, fun analysis of public opinion!

Lots to say on the Tumblr purchase by Yahoo for reportedly $1.1 billion dollars. (yes, you read right).  Yahoo CEO is playing for keeps on this one, and there is much scrutiny... more

Well, the fact that Yahoo has said that they promise not to screw up the deal says a lot about what they already know the general public perception to be of this... more

What's the biggest chatter today in celeb, why, Kanye West, of course.  Not only he still currently a trending topic on Twitter with the release of the album coupled with... more

Issues here of not liking the messenger, liking the message, not liking the message nor the messenger, and so on.  This figure has become quite controversial. ... more

Alright, so while the media pants over the IRS and Benghazi scandals - both of which are rating low interest-o-meter, btw - we're going to turn to something politics related... more

No half-stepping here.  Either the view is adamantly for or definitely against.  Here is the thing:  when you have a first lady who has said in the past that she... more

It's all about scandal, and we don't mean the series on ABC television.  Much going on in the comment arena regarding breaking stories this week. As if the Benghazi probe weren... more

Naturally, this is a big topic.  The comment arena has more than its fair share of sentiment against the president and even the "system" overall, while of course... more