where the SmartPower generation connects

technology

Fri, 06/07/2013 - 10:35pm

Privacy, privacy, privacy. We've said it before, and we'll say it again: privacy and its parameters will continue to become one of the most debated issues of our time.  Certainly most all the comments are a thumbs down on this one, though few are surprised. What might be most interesting is not what is said here, though, but maybe what is being thought.  How long before more devices are made that assure scrambling of information -whether on the black market or above board.  Hmmmm.....     Can you hear me now?

The media is abuzz with news regarding the fact that personal data has apparently been collected on Verizon customers by our National Security Agency as a result of a "top secret order."  All in the name of monitoring behavior that could lead to terrorism, the government has apparently been doing more than its fair share of ear-hustling.  To make matters worse, the White House initially declined to comment but now defends the activities outlined in the report from The Guardian. Yikes.  The reverberation continues through the comment arena even though the news broke the other day.  To the digital public sphere!

What Others Are Saying...

Just Verizon? Who wants to bet on that?

Source:

IMO, the word privacy vary in meaning depending on circumstances and time. That right has been treaded upon by government local, state and federal), private and public entities long before this revelation. Do I like it? No, but I am a realist and know this is a product of our society...

Source:

Its sad the fear people are living with! I could care less who's looking at my phone records, and do you want to know why, I have nothing to hide. All I see are post written in fear!!

Source:

Tue, 05/28/2013 - 5:52pm

Well, we did try and find at least one positive comment.  Thing is, there weren't any - so far - the story has only been posted, max, for about 8 hours.  But the early comments surely show this:  if there is a media shift, and there is one, most people do not think that this alliance is indicative of what the public wants nor needs at the moment.  Driven by males of primarily the same ethnic-background, these deals and perception of what the "public" wants is simply becoming more and more skewed.  Funny that milliennials are the most diverse demographic ever so just who are CNN and Buzzfeed positioning to and for, exactly?  Attempts on both sides for name value moreso that innovation seem to be what commenters are sniffing.  Let's see how this one develops (but judging from the early posts, prospects don't seem to look so great).  Hmmmm.....

Leave it to public opinion to quickly discuss something that two male executives got together and thought was a fab idea.  The latest digital union now seems to be between CNN and Buzzfeed.  They have announced a cozy little relationship that has resulted in a YouTube channel "for milliennials."  Hmmmmm.... CNN gets younger eyeballs (think so?), and Buzzfeed gets credibility (really??!! particularly after recent events and CNN ratings?), resulting in a proud bit of digital boasting by the two, today.  Let's see if the comment-sphere is just as excited as these two media outlets are...

What Others Are Saying...

In related news, TMZ teams up with Sky news, The SUN will cooperate with BBC.As if CNN wasn't bad enough and BuzzFeed wasn't hollow enough, now we can rely on both to deliver the worst coverage to events ever. This isn't tech, this is part of fluffing up our news to the point where the average Joe can't tell right from wrong.Oh wait, I know why we're reading this :) Jonah Peretti, co-founder of HuffPo is also co-founder of Buzzfeed....

Source:

Trying to blur and then obliterate the line between news and crapatorial ads will kill this venture toot sweet!....

Source:

Cnn is no longer a news organization,   Its a corporate shill.

Source:

Mon, 05/20/2013 - 2:46pm

Well, the fact that Yahoo has said that they promise not to screw up the deal says a lot about what they already know the general public perception to be of this acquisition.  Though the tech press seems a bit apprehensive, they are basically applauding the deal itself.  Contrast that with the general (particularly, younger) public; and they seem to be scratching their heads as to what the connection is with a dying brand versus a newer, hipper one.  So this isn't really so much about tech as an opportunity to discuss a type of class within tech and filters based on social sensibilities.  We'll also have to see how all this plays out for Mayer who is spending big bucks and corraling employees back into the office.  Yahoo seems to be a yawn as a brand, but let's see how the next chapters unfold in the public's mind....

Lots to say on the Tumblr purchase by Yahoo for reportedly $1.1 billion dollars. (yes, you read right).  Yahoo CEO is playing for keeps on this one, and there is much scrutiny about the deal with the beloved social media site.  Gotta check the comments for the real public sentiment over the economic experts across every business channel today.  Here we go!

What Others Are Saying...

But why does yahoo even need Tumblr I don't see the logic.

Source:

Mayer sure seems to be doing her best to bring Yahoo around to the 21st century. Their new homepage, the iOS app, Tumblr--all of it speaks to a modern generation. Plus it's an obvious attempt to match another Google service--Google has Blogger, and Yahoo has Tumblr. It's not enough to make me switch, but I like what's being done at Yahoo these days...

Source:

The only bright spot in all this is that maybe some young whippersnapper will come along and start a service that is to Tumblr what Pinboard is to Delicious...

Source:

Mon, 05/13/2013 - 4:47pm

So, a couple of interesting insights from tracking the comments.  One, this fast becomes a conversation about Republicans versus Democrats even among tech bloggers.  Two, it also becomes iPhone versus Android.  Three, it become old versus young.  This is about analog thinkers versus digital thinkers as we watch the new SmartPower era further unfold. We see divisiveness rule even among those who think themselves open-source and open-minded.  An insider today told us that Gringrich probably used this as a ploy simply to dominate today's conversation. If so, at what price does it come, for those who are the influencers use it to further divide and separate.  And the action still reflects on the GOP brand in the public's mind overall whether the party sees it that way or not.  Watch for greater debate about who's in, who's out, and the criteria used to measure it. Those who think they may be manipulating conversation just may find themselves a bit surprised when they see the cultural ripples as a result of value exchange within the digital arena. The days are fast-changing where there is a benefit in just being on the lips of people for the lipsake since so very many people are questioning more deeply, connecting more dots and exchanging sentiment faster and wider than ever before.  You listening, Washington?

In what most be one of the more comical tech-related news pieces of the day, the Newt Gingrich call for re-naming the magical device known as the cell phone has the comment arena hopping.  Earlier today the politico released a video via YouTube suggesting that viewers re-name the cell phone given the fact that the hand-held computing device enables us to do so much more than just talk.  The media has had a field day poking fun at the 69 year old, but let's see what vote the court of public opinion gives him...

What Others Are Saying...

Could it be that Mr. Gingrich does not care for the term "Smart Phone", or is this just another Liberal attempt to embarass another Republican? (Response)  Republicans are an embarrassment.They need no help from liberals

Source:

...Smartphone just does not cover A Smartphone apparently..

Source:

Not surprising that the guy that doesn’t know what a smartphone is would use an iPhone. They are after all more suitable for those seeking a “simple” smartphone than the more techy types that gravitate towards Android....

Source:

Mon, 05/06/2013 - 10:42pm

Look at what's happening here.  Overwhelmingly, across the tech blogs, feathers are a bit ruffled and support still given to Google Glass.  Close and protect the ranks!  There is a bit of sensitivity because not only is the product being ridiculed but also the disconnect that tech journalists often demonstrate when it comes to reviewing something in terms of the average Joe.  The comments under the articles posted by the more general consumer outlets show, for the most part, an identification with the  absurdity demonstrated by the parody.  As tech takes a greater and greater position in our society, how will we deal with divide in both expectations, values and more?  Why does it exist?  What does it say about us as a culture?  Interesting how a little skit can make us face ourselves in such a bare manner.  Looks like we can see even more as a result of Google Glass, huh?

Comments abound regarding the "Saturday Night Live" parody on the upcoming Google Glass product.  The show's infamous "Weekend Update" segment features a would-be tech reporter who reviews Google Glass during their news segment only to find repeated bugs and awkward movements yet still reports that the product is amazing. For any of us who have ever been frustrated with a new tech gadget, the product errors are dead on. Let's look at what the technorati and others have to say about the piece!

What Others Are Saying...

...I cringed through this entire video; it’s one thing to make fun of flaws but it’s just sad when you make up things about a device just so you can make fun of it. Hopefully this doesn’t turn people off to Glass but I’m guessing it will.

Source:

one of the funner SNL moments in quite some time. "reboot, reboot", "Italian, Italian". Oh no I just changed the language settings!...

Source:

Hilarious clip but is far from how it actually works. ...Google has been on point with these glass's I love them.

Source:

Tue, 04/30/2013 - 10:15am

While comments are varied here, it seems that a recurrent theme is that of "no special treatment."  Interesting that this can reflect the opinion of so many given what these veterans have witnessed and experienced!  But this is not unlike much of the sentiment in tech where a false meritocracy seems to rule.  Now that is extended even to veterans, according to much of the popular opinion.  We'll be watching to track this and see if and how goals are met by the White House.

Buzz in the tech world turns today to First Lady Michelle Obama announcing the launch of the IT Training and Certification Partnership. It is a new public-private program that address one of the issues that can prevent our troops from gaining employment in the private sector: Active military personnel typically do not have the industry-recognized certifications that reflect the IT skills and expertise they gained through their military service. This announcement is the second major partnership developed through the Military Credentialing and Licensing Task Force, which was established last June by the Department of Defense at President Obama’s direction. The new Partnership will provide opportunities for up to 161,000 service members to gain industry-recognized, nationally portable certifications necessary for 12 high-demand technology professions, including computer programmers, quality assurance engineers, and IT security analysts. The targeted professions are expected to generate more than 1.8 million job opportunities by 2020, and have an average annual salary of more than $81,000. What say about this, Technorati?

What Others Are Saying...

Make it simple hire the ...best applicant.

Source:

Meanwhile, her husband keeps upping the fees that retired veterans pay for healthcare as well as the taxes they pay on their pensions. They have no use for the military and by showing "concern", it's a smoke screen that they hope you don't notice...

Source:

Absolutely shows the fact the administration has no experience in the job market, or how to get people hired. Just because you're a VET doesn't mean you get the job if all the candidates are equally qualified...

Source:

Fri, 04/19/2013 - 8:18pm

What we are seeing here is clearly debate regarding seemingly "invasive" technology such as this, its benefits and drawbacks.  As more situations like this take place in our world (and, unfortunately, they probably will), the issue of security versus privacy as it intersects with technology will heat up to a firery temperature.  Many values and considerations will be exchanged more expansively in the digital comment arena, rather than quick social media posts. It will be the place to watch.  Buzz words will include "competence", "trust" and "integrity," when discussing these matters!  Stay tuned.  Keeping Boston in our thoughts as all this gets sorted out...

Naturally, commenters have much to say about the Boston bombing and captured suspects, but certainly the tech utilitzed in the manhunt has been of particular interest.  Facial Recognition is a growing technology tool law enforcement agencies have been using to track suspects during crime investigations. In addition to reaching out to the public to ask for help to identify the Boston bombing suspects, the FBI also used facial recognition technology to try and trace the suspects' identities.  The technology uses digital images of a person to match their identity within just a few minutes. While facial recognition technology has high-accuracy when used to match a clear image of a person with another passport-style photo, the current concern it is not as effective when used with low-quality images like the ones the FBI released on Thursday. The standard for facial recognition to be accurate requires 90 pixels of resolution between the two eyes of the pictured person. The pictures the FBI released of the suspects were about 12 pixels between the two eyes. Given the Boston incident, there is now high interest in perfecting this technology for fear of other similar future incidents.  Let's see what the technorati has to say about it all...

What Others Are Saying...

Yeah, facial recognition, my eye... It is frightening to me that our government, run by human beings with human weaknesses, has this kind of reach into our lives!

Source:

It would be incredibly unwise to use facial recognition in a case like this. You do not want a high profile case to try to set court precedence. When it's a crime many people want someone to be brought to justice, you do not want to get the defendant addition ways to have the conviction overturned such as the reliability of the technology used to identify him....

Source:

Luckily the Boston incident may have been caused by a pair of low-rent nutbags, with zero abilities in facial disguise, if today's CCTV is validated. The right solution is far better resolution in CCTV cameras, of course. One suspects that most equipment makers have a vested interest in supplying lots of low-grade equipment which is very cheap to make... If the stuff is low resolution, why specific it, especially in higher security public areas such as central Boston?

Source:

Wed, 04/17/2013 - 2:04pm

While Yahoo!  CEO clearly has her supporters, many are still people smarting from 2008, it seems.  The knives are out, as they say, and people are not just taking any information - particularly financial - at face value any longer.  But we wouldn't count anything out on this one just yet.  There seems to have been a major media campaign to laud Mayer's arrival at Yahoo! before one thing was even accomplished.  The media loved the whole idea, but tech-biz followers never seemed to be as ready to skip through daisies quite that fast.  We'll have to watch here because in the SmartPower era, it's really about bottom-up rather than top-down.  Corporations and corporate heads are certainly not viewed in the same light and revered any longer.  As they say on Bravo, let's "watch what happens" here, for sure!

Today Yahoo reported its first quarter financial performance, and naturally the technorati chimed in.  Information announced included revenue of $1.14 billion, and earnings per share of $0.35 on a GAAP basis, and $0.38 on a non-GAAP basis. Analysts had expected revenue of $1.1 billion, and earnings per share of $0.25. For the quarter, Yahoo had display revenue of $455 million, and search revenue of $425 million. Both of those figures are down on a year by year basis. Still, as the company noted in its release, its GAAP income on a yearly basis is up, rising from $169 million in the first quarter of 2012, to $186 million in the past quarter. The company now has a total of $5.4 billion in cash, equivalents and marketable debt. However, that figure is down from $6 billion at the end of 2012, reflecting a decline in Yahoo’s total cash position.  Still with us? Yahoo’s true cash accounts are down substantially in the last three months, slipping from $2.67 billion at the end of the year, to a mere $1.17 billion. So what does it all mean to the tech commenter?  Let's see....

What Others Are Saying...

...Revenues down, earnings misses, poor economic data abounds, yet yesterday "investors" found it an opportunity to load up on US equities at historic highs...Using Monopoly money, risk free, to criminally inflate equity prices... With billions of dollars invested by mutual funds, on behalf of retirement plans, and on a mandatory basis every two weeks, the US middle class is funding the greatest fraud in history

Source:

It looks to me like we have utilities now in what was a greenfield market.  This arc of new tech introduction is very interesting to watch.  I personally believe that Yahoo! will be around for a very long time.  The search engine revenue is the unseen/unglamorous infrastructure that is less elastic than the front page.  I say Bravo to Marissa...

Source:

There was a reason Marissa was demoted at Google.  The place is in a downward spiral already.  She can't keep doing free haircuts to Yahoo's earnings...

Source:

Tue, 04/16/2013 - 12:24pm

Fuzzy area here, as is evidenced by our comment archaelogy.  It seems to be safety vs. right, but is it that clear a divide.  Watch for this issue to be discussed more and more now as we have more chaotic elements touch our daily lives.  What is legal and what isn't is going to become a huge talking point in terms of carrier and government authority.  In the meantime, CB radio, anyone? Our thoughts are with not only the victims, but the rescue teams and medical personnel involved!

While condolences, prayers and assistance abounds in the wake of the explosions at the Boston Marathon; people are also pondering status of mobile phones and emergencies.  This issue most recently came up during superstorm Sandy.  Now it is being revisited.  Disruptions in service have taken place due to what has been said to be over-usage and not at the request of authorities.  Many have questioned if it is, in fact, legal to order cellular phone carriers to shut down their services under certain circumstances.  Apparently it is, and it's really a matter of procedure in how it would take place. Naturally, this is very controversial.  Commenters abound with thoughts on the current state of the law given in the wake Boston...

What Others Are Saying...

...it’s a scary feeling not being able to get in touch with loved ones, but not being able to get in touch with them because a phone can potentially set off another explosion is even worse. i rather go hours without and then being relieved afterwards finding out they’re okay and not allowing a phone or whatever the remote device was to set it off and possibly never hearing from them again. to me it’s common sense.

Source:

does being a gov't official REQUIRE you to check your brain at the office door? anyone do a risk analysis/contingency plan ahead of time?...

Source:

...repeat: personal safety plans should not rely on mobile availability.

Source:

Tue, 04/09/2013 - 4:37pm

For the most part, it seems people are either skeptical or not feeling it at all.  The more Facebook seems to do, the more it seems to create negative sentiment by the public.  All this begs the question, do most people want Facebook Home or would they prefer that it run away? Privacy is, indeed, an issue; but under the surface, this may just be more about power and control.  This could be a bumpy ride as we watch the individuals who made the disruptors powerful  - and who are now becoming the established corporate outfit - push-back.  Fasten your seatbelts.

Naturally people have quite a bit to say over the latest (and all) Facebook developments.  This bit of news is no different.  The launch of the new Facebook Home app has reopened the privacy debate over whether the social networking site is becoming too much apart of our lives.  Home integrates all of the social network’s services into the operating system of Android phones. Instead of having to download apps to use Instagram, Facebook Messenger, and Facebook Camera, access to these features is consolidated into Facebook Home, which appears on the user’s home screen. The criticism that has arisen is that Facebook wants to compile more information on its users so that it can sell more advertising. Facebook has responded to the criticism following the launch in a blog post to say that the data Home would collect is no different from what the social networking site already tracks and that it is used internally to improve the user experience. For tech-savvy people, who share personal information frequently the hype around Home could be seen as a non-issue, or not.... Let's check it out.

What Others Are Saying...

The first thing I will do with any phone that has a facebook page is uninstall the application, if I can't do that.  I will take it back.  Facebook is one thing in this "Brave New World" that I will never accept or be part of...

Source:

...Because one thing that we don't have enough of as it is is more ways to be on Facebook all the time.

Source:

Interesting to see facebook to get into the mobile buzz not through hardware of their own but through software. Curious to see how the phone companies will deal with this sort of thing. I doubt iOS or Android would want anybody to slap an overlay on their mobile OS...

Source:

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - technology

Anyone can collect comments; but only here will you also get irreverent, fun analysis of public opinion!

Well, we hardly get that first cup of coffee at the office on a Monday morning before we see some major chatter over a race related term. Did he or didn't he?  That's the... more

It seems that people are split on the accuracy or inaccuracy issue as much as they are to simply and directly judge and give an opinion.  Such is the case when one... more

The media is abuzz with news regarding the fact that personal data has apparently been collected on Verizon customers by our National Security Agency as a result of a "top... more

Privacy, privacy, privacy. We've said it before, and we'll say it again: privacy and its parameters will continue to become one of the most debated issues of our... more

Well, UN Ambassador Susan Rice might not have been able to get the okay for Secretary of State, looks like it's now all about her stepping into position as National Security... more

Wow, rough one here for Ms. Rice.  Hard to find almost anyone in her corner - not even on the urban-related sites.  This speaks to the value of transparency in our... more

It's been a few days, but talk is still going strong concerning the attempted suicide attempt by deceased King of Pop, Michael Jackson's daughter, Paris. Said to be unhappy and... more

Sad situations such as this, immediately give us the opportunity to discuss what we value in our society today.  So many of the comments reinforce the fact that... more